|
Review of Webs of Power: Notes from
the Global Uprising
by Jennie Ruby. Previously printed in
"Off Our Backs," Sept/Oct 2002. A venerable
feminist newspaper dating back to the 70's,
visit them at www.offourbacks.org.
If you want to read something inspiring,
read this book. If you are part of the global
justice movements, or a sympathizer, read
this book. If you just want to understand
what the global justice movement is about,
this book isn't a bad place to start for
that either. Starhawk writes both as a kind
of voice of experience and wisdom to the
global justice movement and as a woman struggling
to come to grips with global issues and
action.
Global Issues Made Clear
Starhawk starts out one chapter with a story
about a woman drawing water from a well
in Central America. She describes the woman's
life as it is under the policies of the
World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF): Her children will work
for $4 an hour in a maquiladora (factory)
that produces clothes or electronics that
they cannot afford to buy and that are exported
to developed countries. The factory will
eventually pollute the water in the well,
causing her daughters to be unable to have
children. Starhawk draws connections between
this woman's life and the experiences of
workers in the U.S. who lose their jobs
because their factory moves to Central America.
She also illustrates how chemicals that
give cancer to migrant farm workers also
give the same kind of cancer to those who
eat the fruit they help process. Then (here
comes the inspiring part) she envisions
what these same people's lives could be
like in "a world in which the health of
[this woman by the well], the well-being
of her children, the purity of her well
were the prime concern of every institution
of power."
After describing local and sustainable solutions
to poverty, she points out that the only
obstacle to reaching that vision is the
"structures of political and economic power
that currently govern our world." She calls
for a revolution, and says, "This time,
let's get it right."
The book is divided into two parts: Actions
and Visions. The Actions section gives a
kind of history of the global justice movement
protests in Seattle, DC, Prague, Brazil,
Quebec City, and Genoa. The stories are
intensely personal and engaging. Most of
them were originally posts on the Internet
or short responses to events in the movement,
but together they outline the history and
issues of two years of anti-globalization
organizing.
Actions
The media focus on "a few broken windows"
receives Starhawk's criticism in her discussion
of Seattle. She describes the decentralized
organization of the Seattle protesters and
credits the Direct Action Network for their
work in creating a powerful method of group
action. The protest was organized on the
basis of affinity groups-small groups who
plan how they want to participate in the
larger protest. Within a group, some people
might plan on doing an action and getting
arrested while others may agree to serve
support functions. The affinity group concept
was familiar to me from the days of the
Women's Pentagon Action and the Women's
Peace Encampment at Seneca Falls. Probably
anyone who has done direct actions is familiar
with the concept. The affinity groups were
grouped into Clusters, and a representative
from each group went to spokescouncil meetings,
where overall plans were made. All meetings
were run by consensus.
Police have difficulty understanding leaderless
organization like this, says Starhawk. She
points out that some of the strengths of
this organizing pattern are that it empowers
individuals to decide how far to push themselves
in terms of holding the blockade lines,
risking arrest, staying in jail after arrest,
and putting up with tear gas. In her view,
people so empowered go further and take
things better than those who feel pressured
by leadership to do those things.
Self-identified as a Pagan, feminist, Witch,
and anarchist, Starhawk also describes the
creative aspects of the protests, which
included "art, dance, celebration, song,
ritual, and magic." Throughout the book
she describes the actions of Witches and
the influence of women's spirituality on
the global justice protests. She refers
frequently to the need to create a positive
vision:
"But I believe the system can be dismantled
if we mobilize our radical imagination,
if we create an alternative so inspiring
and compelling that the masses of people
who yearn for both freedom and abundance
will join us."
In describing the planning for the Prague
protests, Starhawk points out some of the
differences between U.S. and European organizers.
In Europe, Socialists and Communists are
much more out in the open, and actions are
assumed to involve conflicts with police
and probably property damage. The U.S. experience
is different, because socialist and communist
elements have remained repressed since the
McCarthy era and the norm of nonviolent
protest is assumed. Starhawk facilitated
an international meeting translated in three
languages where it took nine hours to debate
whether to have the one big march propounded
by the socialists or multiple affinity group
actions as promoted by the anarchists. Eventually
consensus arrived at one big march that
would then break up into different smaller
groups with different agendas.
In foreshadowing of her later Genoa experiences,
Starhawk mentions that arrested Prague protesters
were harassed and even tortured in jail.
A year after Seattle, she writes a description
of the repressive police methods that have
become a pattern at the protests: a media
campaign in advance, portraying the protesters
as violent; surveillance of meetings; pre-emptive
arrests, as in DC; use of tear gas, pepper
spray, water cannons, and concussion grenades;
random arrests of peaceful protesters; apparent
use of provocateurs; intimidation and even
brutality or torture in jail.
At the World Social Forum in Brazil [see
oob…], Starhawk helped train people planning
to protest a later FTAA (Free Trade Area
of the Americas) meeting, and she attended
workshops that informed her more about the
specific problems she had already been protesting.
Threats of privatization of access to water,
failure to meet indigenous people's needs,
threats to small farmers, bioengineering
of crops, limitations on women's rights
are all part of the problems created by
the WTO, FTAA etc.
In Quebec City the spirituality/environmental
aspect of the protests comes to the fore.
Starhawk marched with a group of Pagans
portraying a Living River. Her moving descriptions
of what it is like to be part of the protest,
doing spiral dances, surviving tear gas,
and receiving support from strangers are
intensely involving and inspiring. The connection
between the symbolic dancing and the daunting,
global-level issues being addressed becomes
clear:
"The mostly men running the governments
and the corporations and the economic institutions
of the world seem incapable of grasping
reality: that nature is real, and has limits
and needs of her own that must be respected;
that neither human beings nor forests nor
oil reserves can be endlessly exploited
without causing great damage to the world;
that the basic life support systems of the
planet are under assault."
One of the most interesting essays in the
book is a discussion of violence versus
nonviolence as a strategy for direct action.
Starhawk starts by saying that "I experienced
the nonviolent direct action groups of the
eighties, with their commitment to feminist
process and nonhierarchical structure, as
far more empowering, effective, and liberating."
But she then moves toward an acceptance
of different, perhaps violent, tactics as
actions by people who are not unethical,
but following a different set of values.
I personally think this is a dangerous type
of postmodern thinking: I can't say my values
are better and why, because, well, those
other people see it differently and they
aren't bad people, so I can't condemn even
what I see as their wrong thinking. But
if I can denounce the mentality of Republicans
who ignore the fact that oil is not a renewable
resource, then I can also say that violent
tactics are wrong. I can't help but wonder
if her waffling/acceptance of some use of
violence is because she is working with
men, as opposed to the women's peace actions
of the mid eighties. At one point during
the Genoa protests, she describes a scene
where some of the Black Bloc, protesters
who have decided on wearing masks and carrying
sticks, want to join with a nonviolent group
to try to make their way back to the convergence
center through the chaos of police violence
and tear gas. When the nonviolent group
members ask the bloc members to take off
their masks and put down their sticks, the
Black Bloc refuse, saying that they should
just respect each other's way of doing things.
This made me wonder if perhaps these demands
for respect were a little one-sided, with
young male protesters demanding respect
for their violent choices from the perhaps
predominantly female nonviolent groups.
Starhawk does not end up endorsing violence
at all, but rather focuses on the end goals
of the protests. She calls for creative
and yet "real" protests, with "real" meaning
actually interfering with the processes
of the global forces being protested, while
gaining the support of a broad spectrum
of individuals, even including turning some
of the police enforcing the status quo.
I like this, and to me, it sounds like nonviolent
actions would be the only ones to meet these
criteria. Later in the book, after her direct
experiences of what she calls Fascism in
Genoa, Starhawk more forcefully returns
to advocating for nonviolent protest, saying
that it can even be more dangerous and require
more bravery than "anonymous street fighting."
Yet she maintains her position that all
the protesters have to respect each other's
tactics.
Genoa: after a day of tear gassing and beating
protesters in the street, police storm the
Independent Media Center and club and beat
everyone they can find. Starhawk types with
shaking fingers an Internet message from
the building across the street as she watches
the injured being carried out in stretchers.
In the aftermath she writes about the purposeful
state violence, clearly labeling it as fascism,
and she writes more forcefully for nonviolence.
9-11
She writes fluently about how her spirituality
is getting her through after 9-11, and writes
even more clearly about the need for tactics
"that can be empowering, visionary, and
confrontational without reading as prototerrorist."
Visions
If this book had ended with the stories
of the global justice protests and the responses
to 9-11, it would have been an awesome book.
The addition of these through-provoking
essays makes it even better. I read these
essays practically yelling, "yes, yes, yes"
or alternately vigorously underlining and
asterisking passages that were either right-on
or fabulously thought-provoking. For example,
in an essay on the relationship between
humans and nature, Starhawk goes beyond
the usual admonitions of public television
nature shows that tell us that if we don't
stop destroying the rainforest, many rare
and beautiful creatures will be gone, implying
that people are merely destructive. She
points out that people are not motivated
"out of feeling bad, guilty, wrong, and
inauthentic," and advocates becoming more
aware of the human place in nature. She
cites the Movimiento Sim Terre (Landless
Rural Workers Movement of Brazil) as saying
"Human beings are precious because their
intelligence, work, and organization can
protect and preserve all forms of life"-a
much more positive and motivating attitude.
Starhawk's essay on building a diverse movement
clarified for me some perceptions I have
held for a long time when she discusses
the difference between liberation as inclusion
and liberation as social challenge and change.
Finally, her delineation of principles for
a new world should simply be printed out
and sent to every world government as its
new marching orders. If a better world is
possible, Starhawk certainly has some of
the keys.
Previously printed in "Off Our Backs," Sept/Oct 2002. A venerable feminist newspaper dating back to the 70's, visit them at www.offourbacks.org. (Note: page will open in a new browser window)
Back to
Webs of Power book page
Back to Starhawk's Writings page
Back to Starhawk's Home page
|
 |